Clinical and radiological evaluation of transtrochanteric hip fractures treated with the DHS system.

DHS in intertrochanteric hip fractures

Authors

  • Andres Peredo Lazarte Residente de cuarto año de traumatología y ortopedia Caja Nacional de Salud(CNS)

Keywords:

dynamic hip system, hip fracture, cut out

Abstract

Objectives:  the objective of the study is the result of the clinical and radiological results of the surgical treatment with the DHS system in transtrocanteric hip fractures in the Hospital Obrero No 2, during the administration 2017-2018. 

Methods:  this is an observational, prospective study in the traumatology service of Worker’s Hospital No. 2. We included 52 patients who were admitted with a transtrochanteric hip fracture and who underwent surgery with the DHS system. The evaluation of the operated hip is developed in the fourth and the sixth month after the surgery according to the Oxford Hip Score.

Results:  of the 52 patients, 36 (62%) were women and the rest were males. The average age was 82 years, in 61% (32) the affected side was the left. According to the AO classification, the most frequent transtrocanteric hip fractures were unstable fractures in 55.7% (29) and 44.3% (23) had stable fracture. The trimming or extrusion of the DHS screw outside the head of the femur has occurred in 5.7% of cases. The  functionality according to the Oxford scale at 4and 6 months postoperatively indicates a satisfactory evolution in 60%.

Conclusions: the DHS system is the main option used in the SNC for this type of fracture, with  good results according to the Oxford functional scale.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

- Santana Suárez R. Estudio descriptivo y comparativo de fracturas pertrocantéreas de fémur tratadas con tornillo dinámico y sistema intramedular. Tesis doctoral. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Mayo-2013.

- Dinamarca-Montecinos J. et al. Características epidemiológicas y clínicas de las fracturas de cadera en adultos mayores en un hospital público chileno. Revista Médica Chile 2015; 143: 1552-1559

Kellam J, and Meinberg G. AO. Trauma International Board representatives: Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium—2018. J Orthop Trauma • Volume 32, Number 1 Supplement, January 2018

Palomino L, Ramírez R, Vejarano J, Ticse R. Fractura de cadera en el adulto mayor: la epidemia ignorada en el Perú. Acta Med Peru. 2016;33(1):15-20 [ Links ]

Carrero Palacios R. “Experiencia del manejo quirúrgico de las fracturas intertrocantéreas en pacientes ingresados al Hospital Antonio Lenín Fonseca año 2013” Managua, Marzo 2015

Morales Guerrero O, et al. Tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas intertrocantericas del fémur con placa tornillo dinámico convencional comparado con tornillo dinámico helicoidal. Trabajo de tesis. Bogotá, marzo-2014.

Aguilar-Alcalá L, Atri-Levy J, Torres-Gómez A, Ochoa-Olvera. Factores asociados a fallo en la osteosíntesis de fracturas transtrocantéricas. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana 2017; 31(4): Jul.-Ago: 189-195.

Nilo Fulvi A. Distancia punta-ápex como predictor de desanclaje del tornillo dinámico en pacientes con fractura transtrocanterica manejados con el sistema DHS. trabajo de tesis presentada al instituto mexicano del seguro social. Veracruz. 2014

Joshua Jacob, Ankit Desai,* and Alex Trompeter, Decision Making in the Management of Extracapsular Fractures of the Proximal Femur – is the Dynamic Hip Screw the Prevailing Gold Standard? The Open Orthopaedics Journal. 2017

Siwach K, Swarup A, Dube AS, Rastogi A, Malhotra S, Sharma GD. The Answer to Unstable Peritrochanteric Fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases Jan – June 2017;32(1):38-43.

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Peredo Lazarte A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of transtrochanteric hip fractures treated with the DHS system.: DHS in intertrochanteric hip fractures. GMB [Internet]. 2022 Sep. 30 [cited 2025 Oct. 26];42(2):139-43. Available from: https://www.gacetamedicaboliviana.com/index.php/gmb/article/view/411

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales